222,261 results for at · 2.419s

News for “at”
18 results • 2413 ms server time
Advertisement
Moozonian News
news.ycombinator.com• Mar 9, 2026• 1 min read
Show HN: VectorLens – See why your RAG hallucinates, no configI built VectorLens because I was tired of "log file archaeology" every time my RAG pipeline hallucinated. Usually, when an LLM gives a wrong answer, you're stuck guessing which retrieved chunk misled it—or why the right chunk was ignored.Existing observability tools either require a cloud signup, an enterprise contract, or heavy manual instrumentation of your code. I wanted something that stayed local and just worked.The Solution: Three lines of codePython import vectorlens vectorlens.serve() # Open http://127.0.0.1:7756 # Your RAG code runs as-is (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, ChromaDB, FAISS, etc. are auto-intercepted) How it works technically:Zero-Config Interception: It monkey-patches common LLM and Vector DB clients. You don't have to change your functions or wrap your calls; it intercepts the data flow automatically.Local Hallucination Detection: It uses sentence-transformers (a 22MB model) to compare the LLM’s output sentences against the retrieved context. If the similarity is too
Moozonian News
news.ycombinator.com• Mar 9, 2026• 1 min read
Code-review-graph: persistent code graph that cuts Claude Code token usageHi HN I'm Tirth. I built code-review-graph because I got tired of watching Claude Code re-read my entire codebase on every single task.When you ask Claude Code to review a commit or add a feature, it reads files to understand the codebase. On a small project that's fine. On FastAPI (2,915 files) or Next.js (27,732 files) it scans thousands of files that have nothing to do with your change. You're paying for tokens that add zero value, and more noise makes the review worse.code-review-graph builds a persistent structural map of your code using Tree-sitter. Every function, class, import, call, and inheritance relationship lives in a local SQLite database. When you edit a file or commit, it re-parses only the changed files and their dependants in under 2 seconds. Claude then queries the graph, finds what changed and what depends on it, and reads only the relevant files.Benchmarks on production repos with real commits:• httpx (125 files): 26.2x fewer tokens • FastAPI (2,915 files): 8.1x fe
Moozonian News
github.com• Mar 9, 2026• 1 min read
Show HN: Agentic CLI, Gideon Wins Nvidia GTC Golden Ticket for AI InnovationHey HN,I'm Tarique, co-founder at Cogensec. Our open-source AI agent, Gideon, won a Golden Ticket to NVIDIA GTC 2026! Gideon automates defensive cybersecurity tasks like threat intelligence gathering, CVE hunting, and IOC analysis using LLMs. Excited to collaborate the the dev community and improve Gideon.
Moozonian News
news.ycombinator.com• Mar 9, 2026• 1 min read
Show HN: Time as the 4th Dimension – What if it emerges from rotational motion?I've been developing a framework since 2022 that proposes time is not a static geometric axis (as in Einstein's relativity) but emerges dynamically from the rotational and orbital motion of 3D space.The core idea: each dimension emerges from the previous one by arranging infinite instances perpendicularly. A static 3D space can't do this to itself — but a rotating one can. That perpetual self-perpendicularity is time.From this we can derive the Lorentz factor, E=mc², and the Schwarzschild radius, and propose a testable prediction: intrinsic rotation should contribute independently to time dilation, measurable with atomic clocks.Essay (accessible): https://lisajguo.substack.com/p/time-as-the-fourth-dimension... Paper (Zenodo): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18910834
Advertisement
Moozonian News
news.ycombinator.com• Mar 9, 2026• 1 min read
The internet is being flooded with AI content. How can we tell what is human?The internet is entering a strange phase. For two decades, the main challenge for digital platforms was managing an overwhelming amount of content produced by people. Today the nature of the problem has shifted. What is growing fastest is no longer the number of humans posting online, but the number of machines doing it.Bots write articles, generate videos, compose music, post comments and even simulate debates. In many cases they do this faster, cheaper and at volumes no human team could realistically match. The result is a phenomenon that some researchers have begun to describe as “algorithmic pollution”: platforms saturated with synthetic material that looks authentic but does not come from human experience.Inside technology companies and newsrooms, a question is quietly becoming unavoidable. How do you separate what humans made from what machines generated?Behind the scenes of the internet, the race to answer that question has already started.The invisible avalanche The numbers alo
Moozonian News
klyrx.xyz• Mar 9, 2026• 1 min read
Show HN: Klyrx.xyz - Independent reliability rating for crypto assets&protocolsHey HN,We built Klyrx.xyz - a small, transparent reliability score for crypto assets and protocols. No sponsors, no paid placements, no affiliate links. Just public data + a simple, open formula. Different scoring for different types:- Stable assets (USDT, USDC, etc.): score = 70% market factors (volatility, liquidity, cap, age) + 30% peg stability- Regular assets (BTC, ETH, SOL, etc.): score = 30% volatility + 30% liquidity + 30% market cap + 10% age- Protocols (Lido, Aave, Uniswap, etc.): score = 30% TVL stability + 22% usage + 20% age + 10% security + 18% TVL sizeData comes from CoinGecko, DefiLlama, Dune, and on-chain sources. All weights are visible on the site, and we are open to changing them based on feedback.Current top is interesting: stablecoins lead (makes sense), BTC/ETH are close behind, some protocols score very high due to TVL & security.Would love your thoughts: - Does the weighting feel reasonable? - What important factor is missing? (e.g. exploit history, governance
Advertisement
Moozonian News
leaguedonation.com• Mar 9, 2026• 1 min read
Show HN: League Donation – Comprehensive Fantasy Baseball Analytics DashboardMost fantasy tools hand you a list. One source, one opinion, presented as settled fact. This one shows you the argument behind the list: where your sources agree, where they diverge, and what the divergence means. Source disagreement is the feature. A player ranked 40th by consensus but going in the 70s in ADP is a market inefficiency. A player ranked 40th by consensus but 90th by Statcast projections is a question worth asking. The tool surfaces those gaps rather than collapsing them into a clean number.Rankings and xStats work without a league connection. The xStats section identifies hitters whose surface stats diverge from their expected stats, players whose hard contact has been finding gloves at an unsustainable rate, and gives you the buy signal before the correction happens.Connect your league and it builds around your actual scoring context. Z-scores calibrated to your draftable pool. VORP measured against real positional replacement levels scaled to your league size. Tier clu